0191 232 0283
0191 261 6956
info@srflegal.co.uk
Follow us
    • About
      • SRF TODAY
      • OUR TEAM
      • CAREERS
      • CONTACT & LOCATIONS
    • Commercial
      • Corporate and Commercial
      • Commercial Property
      • Dispute Resolution
      • Debt Recovery
      • Employment Law
      • Insolvency
      • Regulation and Financial Crime
    • Private Client
      • Family Law
      • Wills, Trusts and Probate
      • Buying and Selling Property
    • News & Events
      • FIRM NEWS
      • EVENTS & SEMINARS
      • SRF NEST
    1. Home
    2. News
    3. Supreme Court delivers ground breaking decision on ET fees

    Supreme Court delivers ground breaking decision on ET fees


    Published on: 26th July 2017

    A major development has today taken place in the Supreme Court.  Many of you will be aware that over the last couple of years we have seen the introduction of Employment Tribunal fees leading to a vast reduction in the number of claims brought in the Employment Tribunal.

    However, this morning in what has been heralded as “the most important judgment in employment law over the last 50 years” the Supreme Court has found that the Employment Tribunal and the Employment Appeal Tribunal Fees Order 2013 (Fees Order) actually prevents access to justice and is unlawful.

    Interestingly one of the Supreme Court judges found that having a different level of fees for discrimination cases was an act of indirect discrimination.

    So what are the immediate consequences of this decision:

    • As of today, fees ceased to be payable for claims in the Employment Tribunal and appeals to the Employment Appeal Tribunal
    • Fees paid in the past must be reimbursed.

    However, experts are advising that the judgment has a wider constitutional significance by preserving the right to access to justice and clarifying that the ability to bring a claim to the Employment Tribunal is a fundamental constitutional right.

    It also means given the strong ruling of the Supreme Court that future restrictions of all kinds (not just financial barriers) on access to the Courts will be subjected to the closest scrutiny.

    In terms of employer-employee relations, employers who have been following a best practice approach will have little to fear.  However, it may well be the case that employees are now feeling less restricted in bringing claims forward.

    It does not necessarily mean that all the matters will run the full course to Employment Tribunal as we will still have the ACAS Conciliation procedure in place.

    However, it does mean that employers may be facing an increase in the level of complaints/claims coming through and should prepare accordingly.

    The most effective route is of course to take proactive positions and review all discipline/grievance/equal opportunities policies to ensure that you are compliant.

    It remains to be seen exactly how the UK government will respond.  It  is unlikely the fees regime will be abolished entirely.

    Commentators have indicated that it is probable that the UK government will issue a consultation paper and try and implement a new fees regime, with fees at a lower level and/or involving a fee payable by the employer when the employer lodges its ET3.

    Another interesting point is what is to be done about those people who could argue that they did not bring a claim because of the fees hurdle. Will time limits be extended? Watch this space.

    Should clients require further advice on any of these issues or the implications of this breaking development then please contact either Max Winthrop or David Gibson at these offices.

    MORE

    • The FCA proposes tighter controls over Appointed Representatives (ARs)
    • Landlords and CVAs – CVAs triumph again
    • What is a Section 166 Notice from the FCA?
    • ICO calls businesses into action for the Children’s Code
    • Administrators’ duty of care in company sales
    • Breach of confidence by administrators
    • Liability of jointly appointed administrators
    • Telephone maintenance
    • The Financial Conduct Authority are looking to refuse my application for authorisation, what should I do?
    • ICO enforcement during Coronavirus public health emergency
    • Property possession: how do you proceed post-pandemic?
    • Losing the right to terminate supply: the impact of the Corporate Governance and Insolvency Act 2020
    • Employee claims in liquidation
    • Speeding during lockdown – the consequences of a heavy right foot!
    • Furlough Fraud – to confess or not confess: that is the question?
    • Finding The Time to Recap on Inheritance Tax Allowances
    • Coronavirus Causing A Surge in Wills and Powers of Attorney: Keeping Safe While Getting Affairs In Order And An Appreciation For Our NHS
    • The first ever compensation order
    • Driving and ‘using’ mobile phones – an update
    • Uber’s Huge Data Breach Hush-Up
    • Company Directors Oblivious to New Data Protection Rules
    • Warning for workers following data protection prosecution
    • Financial Crime Response Reforms to be Announced by end of 2017
    • Charities - Still Chugging Along?
    • Constructive dismissal explained - Podcast
    • ICO warns companies about the costly consequences of making nuisance calls
    • Charities - New Challenges New Opportunities
    • Breast Cancer Charity is first to be given official warning from the charity commission
    • Tata Fined £1m After Staff Exposed to Toxic Gas
    • Talk Talk Fined by ICO Again....
    • Claims Management Regulator Annual Report Summary 2016 - 2017
    • A New Data Protection Bill: Planned Reforms
    • Supreme Court delivers ground breaking decision on ET fees
    • New Regulator, New Preference Service, New Rules!
    • New Support Lawyer Joins Regulatory Law Department
    • ICO Publishes International Strategy
    • General Data Protection Regulation 2016: could your failures to protect data leave your company insolvent?
    • Signs of flexibility in EU markets?
    • Ransomware. Are you the victim or the perpetrator?
    • Transfer of claims management regulation – are you FCA ready?
    • The Best Possible Deal
    • Lobbying Act 2014: are you aware of its impact?
    • Deal or no Deal
    • Leap into the unknown
    • Newcastle law firm form specialist team
    • Newcastle University
    • Brexington Post - Issue 3
    • Supreme Court Ruling
    • Average Speed Camera Myth Buster
    • 12 days (and perils) of Christmas
    • Rising Star : Alexandra Withers
    • SRF Appoints Christine McVay as Head of its Family Law Division

    CONTACT US

  • 4 Mosley Street
    Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 1DE
    Tel: 0191 232 0283 Fax: 0191 261 6956
    Email: info@srflegal.co.uk
    DX: 61037 Newcastle

    Short Richardson and Forth Solicitors Limited is a private limited company registered in England and Wales under company No. 10572065, authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority No. 637150.

    Short Richardson and Forth Solicitors Limited is a private limited company constituted and run in accordance with the provisions of the Companies Act 2006. The term “partner” has been used to denote individual senior solicitors employed by Short Richardson and Forth Solicitors Limited.

    Website Privacy Policy

    Complaints Procedure

    • ABOUT
    • SRF Today
    • Our Team
    • Careers
    • Contacts & Location
    • COMMERCIAL
    • Corporate and Commercial
    • Commercial Property
    • Dispute Resolution
    • Debt Recovery
    • Employment Law
    • Insolvency
    • Regulation and Financial Crime
    • PRIVATE CLIENTS
    • Family Law
    • Wills, Trusts and Probate
    • Buying and Selling Property
    • NEWS & EVENTS
    • Firm News
    • Events & Seminars
    • SRF Nest